What is the difference between responsible and responsive

Social responsiveness can be demonstrated in engaging in activities such as volunteering at the local homeless shelter, refugee camps, etc. This is social responsiveness. Social responsibility refers to the moral or ethical duty an individual and or a social entity as members of a society to behave in a way that will not harm, but benefit the society. Thus, this is the main difference between social responsibility and social responsiveness.

Social responsibility is acting and behaving in a way that will not harm but benefit others. On the other hand, social responsiveness is working towards the welfare of others by contributing to addressing existing social issues. Hence, this is another difference between social responsibility and social responsiveness.

Their aims is another difference between social responsibility and social responsiveness. The main aim of social responsibility is to be accountable for the betterment of society and the environment by not committing any acts that will harm others as well as destroy the environment. On the other hand, the main aim of social responsiveness is to be able to contribute to the welfare of others and the betterment of the society and environment by addressing some of the critical social problems in ways such as doing volunteering activities, environment conservation campaigns, etc.

Social responsibility and social responsiveness are two inter-related concepts. At the upcoming Annual Meeting in Davos, the World Economic Forum will present numerous new initiatives, all developed through public-private cooperation, to address the challenges listed above.

These initiatives particularly relate to the need for innovative concepts to foster greater social inclusion. The reality is that the future offers humankind many opportunities for healthier, greener, more fulfilled and peaceful lives. It is incumbent on all of us — working together — to improve the state of the world. By exercising responsive and responsible leadership, we can make this possibility our reality. The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Should governments do more to combat the climate crisis? For 60 years, Antarctica has seen strong global cooperation. But without hitting ambitious targets at COP26, it will significantly disrupt global systems. I accept. Take action on UpLink. Explore context.

Explore the latest strategic trends, research and analysis. License and Republishing. Written by. More on Global Governance View all. This is what people think policymakers should do to tackle climate change Should governments do more to combat the climate crisis? Johnny Wood 10 Nov Antarctica has benefitted from extraordinary global cooperation. Are its days numbered? Steven Chown 05 Nov If the world is serious about sustainability, it must embark on a new era of global law Maksim Burianov 02 Nov These are the jobs currently driving the economic recovery across Europe Patrick Henry 27 Oct Being responsive means giving the government exactly what it wants.

When a government buying agency invites vendors to submit a bid, it has very specific requirements in mind. The time to offer alternatives is before the invitation to bid is issued. Being responsive extends to preparing your bid according to the instructions. There is typically a very specific cutoff date and time when bids must be received in the buying office.

The idea is to give all bidders the same amount of time and an equal opportunity to gather information and prepare their bids. Pay close attention to all requirements.